With “Top 10 Most Hated Athletes of All Time” as our focus, we dive into the fascinating world of public perception in sports. Why do certain athletes garner such intense dislike? Is it their on-field actions, off-field scandals, or a complex interplay of factors? We’ll explore the reasons behind this animosity, from historical controversies to modern social media trends, and analyze the impact on athletes’ careers and personal lives.

This deep dive into the minds of fans and the media will unearth the factors that contribute to an athlete’s notoriety, ranging from controversial plays to personal issues. We’ll look at specific examples of athletes who have been targeted with intense hatred, examining the controversies surrounding them and their effect on public opinion.

Table of Contents

Defining “Hated”: Top 10 Most Hated Athletes Of All Time

Sports, a realm of intense passion and competition, often sparks strong reactions from fans. While vigorous debate and criticism are common, the line between legitimate critique and outright hatred can be blurry. Understanding the nuances of this sentiment is crucial in evaluating the complex relationship between athletes and their audiences.The term “hated” in the context of sports goes beyond mere disapproval.

It signifies a deep-seated animosity, often fueled by perceived transgressions, poor performance, or public image issues. This animosity manifests in various ways, impacting the athlete’s reputation and well-being.

Manifestations of Hatred

The expression of hatred towards athletes is multifaceted. Fan reactions, ranging from jeers and boos to physical altercations, demonstrate the raw emotion surrounding sporting figures. Media portrayals, often driven by sensationalism, can contribute to a negative image, shaping public perception in a way that fosters hatred. Social media, with its ability to amplify and disseminate opinions rapidly, provides a platform for widespread condemnation and criticism, sometimes blurring the lines between legitimate debate and hateful vitriol.

Distinguishing Criticism from Hatred

Legitimate criticism, in contrast to hatred, focuses on an athlete’s performance, conduct, or character within the framework of sporting standards. It often involves constructive feedback and an expectation of improvement. Hatred, however, is characterized by a deeply personal animosity, devoid of constructive intent. It transcends specific actions and permeates the overall perception of the athlete, frequently driven by factors beyond their control.

Factors Contributing to Hatred

Several factors can contribute to the perception of an athlete as “hated.” Poor performance, especially in high-profile competitions, can quickly generate widespread disapproval. Controversial actions, such as off-field incidents or violations of ethical standards, can ignite public anger and resentment. Public perception plays a significant role, with perceived arrogance, a perceived lack of sportsmanship, or an image problem often fueling hatred.

Media narratives, especially those focusing on negativity, can reinforce these perceptions.

Examples of Intense Criticism without Hatred

While some athletes face intense scrutiny and criticism, it does not necessarily translate to hatred. Athletes who experience significant setbacks, endure difficult periods, or face harsh competition can be subject to harsh commentary and analysis, yet their overall image may not be one of widespread hatred. Examples include athletes who endure prolonged periods of underperformance, or athletes who face intense rivalries or criticisms stemming from particular games or competitions.

It’s important to distinguish between temporary disapproval and sustained, pervasive animosity.

Historical Context

The evolution of public perception towards athletes, and the subsequent emergence of “hated” figures, is a complex tapestry woven from threads of controversy, changing social norms, and evolving media landscapes. Understanding this historical context is crucial to comprehending the multifaceted nature of athlete-fan relationships and the factors that contribute to negative public opinion. From the early days of professional sports to the digital age, the reasons for athlete hatred have been influenced by a multitude of factors.The public’s response to athletic controversies has been shaped by the values and priorities of different eras.

What was considered acceptable or tolerable in one time period might be viewed as reprehensible in another. This dynamic interplay of social evolution and athlete conduct significantly impacts how we view and judge athletes today. The interplay between athlete actions, societal expectations, and the media’s role in shaping public opinion is critical to understanding the phenomenon of athlete hatred.

Controversies Fueling Negative Perceptions

A timeline of major controversies involving athletes reveals shifts in public opinion and expectations. Early examples, often rooted in racial or gender biases, showcase how societal norms impacted the public’s perception of athletes. Later controversies, fueled by issues like performance-enhancing drugs, gambling, and domestic violence, demonstrate the evolving moral compass of society.

Early 20th Century: The segregation of professional sports leagues and the treatment of minority athletes sparked significant controversy, leading to a backlash against athletes who were perceived as challenging established social hierarchies. Examples include the exclusion of African American athletes from major league baseball until the mid-20th century. This period showcases how racial bias and social prejudice played a major role in shaping public perception.
Mid-20th Century: The rise of professional sports and the increasing visibility of athletes led to a surge in public interest and scrutiny. Controversies around player behavior and conduct began to emerge, impacting public perception. Examples include disputes over salaries and player strikes.
Late 20th Century: The introduction of performance-enhancing drugs became a major source of controversy. This era saw the rise of scandals and accusations, which resulted in a change in public opinion about athletes’ commitment to fair play and the integrity of competition.
21st Century: The rise of social media and the 24/7 news cycle have amplified controversies surrounding athletes. Public discussions of athletes’ off-field behavior, personal lives, and social media posts have generated intense public debate and often resulted in negative perceptions.

Evolution of Public Opinion

Public opinion of athletes has evolved dramatically over time. Early public perceptions were often shaped by racial and gender biases, but as society progressed, so did the standards for athlete conduct. The public’s expectation of athletes has changed in tandem with societal values and cultural shifts. The evolving public perception can be analyzed through the lens of societal norms and the influence of media.

Pre-Social Media Era: Public opinion was largely influenced by traditional media outlets, such as newspapers and television. Coverage of athlete conduct was often filtered through a lens of societal norms. Controversies were often reported, but the public’s immediate reaction and ability to engage directly were limited.
Social Media Era: The rise of social media platforms has allowed for unprecedented public engagement with athletes. Real-time feedback, social media trends, and public discussions have fundamentally altered how controversies unfold and shape public opinion. The instantaneous nature of social media allows for rapid dissemination of information and public reaction, which can both elevate and damage an athlete’s image.

Media Influence

The media, in all its forms, plays a critical role in shaping public perception of athletes. From traditional print and broadcast outlets to the digital age, media outlets have the power to highlight controversies, amplify voices, and shape public discourse.

Traditional Media: Newspapers and television broadcasts have historically played a significant role in shaping public opinion. The narrative presented by these media outlets often shaped the way the public viewed athletes, their actions, and the context surrounding controversies.
Social Media: Social media platforms have become powerful tools for disseminating information and shaping public opinion. The ability to share opinions, engage in discussions, and quickly spread information creates an environment where controversies can quickly escalate or be mitigated.

Categories of Hated Athletes

Analyzing the reasons behind the intense dislike directed towards certain athletes reveals distinct categories. The animosity can stem from actions on the field, off-the-field controversies, or perceived character traits. Understanding these facets is crucial for comprehending the complexities of athlete-fan relationships.

On-Field Actions: Controversial Plays and Poor Sportsmanship

On-field actions frequently fuel fan resentment. Controversial plays, questionable calls, and displays of poor sportsmanship often incite passionate reactions from fans, leading to widespread disapproval. Players who consistently engage in these behaviors are likely to attract considerable criticism and negative sentiment.

Athlete	Sport	Reasons for Hatred
Ben Roethlisberger (NFL)	American Football	Multiple accusations of throwing incomplete passes, leading to controversial losses and penalties, along with displays of questionable sportsmanship, such as excessive celebrations or post-game confrontations.
Manny Pacquiao (Boxing)	Boxing	Controversial decisions in fights, perceived arrogance, and sometimes disrespectful or overly aggressive behavior during matches.
Mike Tyson (Boxing)	Boxing	Infamous for his aggressive fighting style, which included numerous controversial actions and acts of violence, both in and out of the ring.

Off-Field Actions: Scandals, Endorsements, and Personal Issues

Athletes’ off-field actions often contribute to negative perceptions and hatred. Scandals, endorsements perceived as inappropriate, and personal issues that damage their public image frequently lead to a decline in popularity and intense dislike. The impact of these events can extend beyond the immediate fallout, impacting long-term reputations.

Athlete	Sport	Reasons for Hatred
Tiger Woods (Golf)	Golf	Multiple extramarital affairs, leading to significant damage to his image and career, and affecting his personal life.
Lance Armstrong (Cycling)	Cycling	Accusations of doping and fabricating a heroic image, leading to widespread public distrust and negative perception.
Alex Rodriguez (Baseball)	Baseball	Allegations of using performance-enhancing drugs, and various other controversies, including those involving his personal life, negatively affected his public image.

Perceived Arrogance and Lack of Effort

Perceived arrogance or a lack of effort can also lead to widespread dislike. Some athletes’ demeanor or actions may be perceived as overly confident, disrespectful, or lacking in the dedication expected of them. This perception can be influenced by individual interpretations and cultural contexts.

Athlete	Sport	Reasons for Hatred
LeBron James (Basketball)	Basketball	Sometimes viewed as excessively confident, perceived lack of effort in certain situations, or showing disinterest in the game, and perceived arrogance.
Serena Williams (Tennis)	Tennis	Instances of perceived arrogance, and displays of unsportsmanlike conduct.
Conor McGregor (MMA)	Mixed Martial Arts	Excessive boasting, and aggressive behavior perceived as disrespectful to opponents and the sport.

Public Perception and Reactions

Public perception plays a crucial role in shaping an athlete’s legacy. The intensity of public reaction, often fueled by social media and amplified by the 24/7 news cycle, can significantly impact an athlete’s career and personal life. From controversy to scandal, the public’s response often determines the lasting narrative surrounding a figure. This response can be complex, ranging from widespread condemnation to surprisingly supportive stances, depending on the specifics of the situation.The impact of athlete behavior on public perception is multifaceted.

Actions perceived as unethical, unprofessional, or simply poor judgment can swiftly generate significant negativity. Conversely, athletes who demonstrate sportsmanship, community involvement, and positive values often garner considerable public support. This dynamic interplay between athlete actions and public response forms a complex feedback loop, shaping the perception and ultimately the career trajectory of the athlete.

Examples of Public Reactions to Athlete Controversies

Public reactions to athlete controversies are often swift and intense, particularly in the digital age. Social media platforms serve as powerful amplifiers, allowing opinions to spread rapidly. Trends related to controversial athlete behavior often dominate social media timelines, demonstrating the public’s immediate and often polarized responses. Fan protests, boycotts, and online campaigns are common manifestations of public discontent.For instance, the 2016 NFL season saw numerous protests and online debates following the national anthem kneeling movement by several players.

The protests, rooted in social justice issues, sparked heated public discourse and divided fan bases, demonstrating the significant impact of athlete actions on public perception. Another example is the fallout surrounding the use of performance-enhancing drugs. The public’s reaction to such controversies can be swift and severe, leading to boycotts, fan discontent, and, in extreme cases, a significant decline in popularity.

Impact of Athlete Hatred on Careers and Personal Lives

The negative public response can significantly affect an athlete’s career and personal life. Public hatred can lead to career setbacks, reduced endorsements, and even threats and harassment. The pressure and scrutiny can take a toll on an athlete’s mental and emotional well-being. The potential for reputational damage is substantial, making it crucial for athletes to navigate public perception carefully.For example, several athletes have seen their endorsements and sponsorships withdrawn after public controversies.

The negative publicity often follows them, making it difficult to regain public trust and support. Furthermore, the harassment and threats can make an athlete’s personal life challenging, impacting their safety and well-being.

Role of Social Media in Amplifying Negativity

Social media has become a powerful tool for amplifying negative public reactions toward athletes. The instantaneous nature of social media allows for the rapid spread of opinions, often without adequate context or consideration for nuance. This can lead to a significant escalation of negativity, often impacting the athlete’s reputation beyond what might be observed in traditional media outlets.The ability of social media to quickly disseminate information and create trends can be a double-edged sword.

While it can facilitate public dialogue, it can also lead to an overwhelming and often unfair barrage of negativity. The lack of personal interaction in many online forums and the anonymity afforded by social media platforms often leads to more extreme reactions than in traditional forums.

Comparison of Public Criticism and Negative Reactions

Method of Criticism	Description	Impact on Athlete	Example
Social Media Trends	Rapid spread of negative opinions and hashtags.	Significant reputational damage, loss of sponsorships, potential career setbacks.	#Cancel[Athlete’s Name]
Fan Protests	Public displays of disapproval, often at games or events.	Loss of support, potential for decreased attendance, negative media coverage.	Fan boycotts of an athlete’s team.
Media Coverage	Negative articles and reports in newspapers, magazines, or television.	Damage to reputation, loss of endorsements, potential career decline.	Negative articles detailing controversial actions.
Online Harassment	Direct abuse and threats directed at the athlete.	Significant mental and emotional stress, potential for legal action, safety concerns.	Online abuse directed at an athlete’s social media accounts.

This table highlights the various ways public criticism can manifest and the potential impact on athletes’ careers and personal lives. Each method presents unique challenges, necessitating careful management and response from athletes and their teams.

Methods of Measuring Hatred

Quantifying the intensity of public animosity towards athletes is a complex endeavor. While we can’t definitively “measure hatred,” we can employ various methods to analyze and understand the level and nature of negative sentiment. These approaches provide valuable insights into the public perception of athletes and the factors contributing to their unpopularity. A comprehensive assessment requires a multi-faceted approach.Measuring public opinion requires going beyond simple anecdotal evidence and delving into quantifiable data.

By using various metrics and analyzing different data sources, we can create a more objective understanding of the degree of hatred towards an athlete. This approach allows for a more nuanced analysis that transcends individual biases and focuses on statistically significant trends.

Social Media Trend Analysis

Analyzing social media data provides a powerful lens into public sentiment. Platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram allow for real-time monitoring of conversations surrounding athletes. Sentiment analysis tools can identify the overall tone of posts, comments, and tweets. A significant volume of negative comments, coupled with a high percentage of negative sentiment, would indicate a strong level of public dislike.

Tools can differentiate between simple criticism and outright hatred by analyzing the emotional intensity and use of aggressive language. For example, the frequency of hate speech, derogatory terms, and personal attacks would indicate a more intense level of hatred.

Media Coverage Evaluation

Media coverage often reflects public perception. Assessing the frequency and nature of negative articles, news stories, and editorials provides insights into the level of negativity surrounding an athlete. Counting the number of negative articles, identifying the use of harsh language, and analyzing the context of the coverage can help to determine the severity of the public’s disapproval. A significant portion of media coverage dedicated to negative aspects of an athlete’s career, behavior, or performance would indicate a strong public negative sentiment.

For example, a disproportionate amount of news coverage focusing on controversies or scandals surrounding a particular athlete, rather than their athletic achievements, could signify widespread public disapproval.

Proposed Method for Measuring and Categorizing Levels of Hatred

Level of Hatred	Social Media Metrics	Media Coverage Metrics	Combined Score (Example)
Low	Few negative comments, predominantly constructive criticism	Limited negative coverage, mostly focused on performance	1-3
Medium	Increased volume of negative comments, occasional hate speech	Moderate negative coverage, some controversy-related articles	4-7
High	Significant volume of negative comments, frequent hate speech, personal attacks	Extensive negative coverage, consistent focus on controversies	8-10

This table provides a rudimentary framework for categorizing the level of hatred. The scoring system allows for a comparative analysis of athletes based on different metrics. It’s crucial to remember that these are examples, and the specific metrics and weightings should be adjusted based on the specific athlete and the nature of the public reaction.

Comparison of Metrics and Methods

Comparing social media sentiment analysis with media coverage analysis provides a more comprehensive picture of public perception. Social media data reflects real-time public opinion, while media coverage often represents a broader perspective, though potentially delayed. Combining these methods allows for a more robust understanding of the athlete’s image problem. For example, a strong social media backlash might be mirrored in negative media coverage, further strengthening the evidence of widespread disapproval.

Conversely, if social media trends indicate low public disapproval, but media coverage consistently portrays the athlete negatively, it could indicate a bias within the media.

Illustrative Examples

Public perception of athletes is often shaped by controversies and actions, sometimes resulting in strong dislike and animosity. Examining specific examples helps understand the factors contributing to this hatred and how public opinion can shift, or remain stagnant, despite individual actions or behavior. Analyzing these cases reveals the complexity of athlete-fan relationships and the impact of controversy on reputation.Understanding the nuances of athlete-fan relationships requires looking beyond simplistic narratives.

Factors such as performance, character, and the broader historical context surrounding an athlete’s career all play a role in shaping public opinion. The following examples illustrate athletes whose careers were significantly impacted by controversies, and contrast them with athletes who, despite criticism, retained positive images.

Controversial Athletes: The Impact of Negative Actions

Examining athletes who have faced significant public backlash reveals a range of controversies. These controversies, from on-field disputes to off-field actions, can deeply impact an athlete’s public image. These incidents, often amplified by media coverage, can result in significant negative public reaction.

Ben Roethlisberger, a highly successful NFL quarterback, faced numerous accusations of sexual assault. The resulting investigations and legal proceedings negatively impacted his image, leading to a significant portion of the public viewing him unfavorably. This case highlights how allegations, even if not proven in court, can damage an athlete’s reputation and create lasting negative impressions.
Alex Rodriguez, a renowned MLB player, faced criticism for his alleged use of performance-enhancing drugs. His public image was severely tarnished by these accusations. The subsequent investigation and the public perception of his actions, combined with the subsequent fallout, significantly damaged his standing with fans.
Tiger Woods, a golfing icon, experienced a series of controversies, including extramarital affairs and accusations of unethical behavior. These events severely impacted his image, causing a significant portion of the public to lose respect for him.

Best Male Football Player in the World A Deep Dive

Athletes Who Maintained Positive Images Despite Criticism

Not all athletes facing criticism experience the same level of negative reception. Some maintain positive images, despite controversies. This can be attributed to various factors, including the nature of the criticism, the athlete’s response, and the overall context.

Michael Jordan, despite some criticism about his playing style, maintained a highly positive public image. This was likely due to his exceptional athletic performance, the respect he commanded on and off the court, and his ability to deflect criticism effectively.
Serena Williams, despite facing controversies related to her on-court conduct and controversial statements, has largely maintained a positive public image due to her consistent dominance in the sport and her strong advocacy for social causes.
Tom Brady, a highly successful NFL quarterback, has faced criticism for his playing style and off-field actions, yet has generally retained a positive public image.

Factors Differentiating Public Reception

The varying public receptions of athletes facing criticism are often influenced by factors like the nature of the controversy, the athlete’s response, and the overall context of the event.

Athlete	Controversy	Factors Influencing Reception
Ben Roethlisberger	Sexual assault allegations	Serious nature of the allegations, public scrutiny, lack of clear resolution
Michael Jordan	Aggressive playing style	Exceptional performance, respect for his skills, effective deflection of criticism
Serena Williams	On-court conduct, controversial statements	Consistent dominance in the sport, advocacy for social causes, strong personal brand

Potential Motivations

The animosity directed towards certain athletes often transcends simple disagreements about play. Delving into the psychological underpinnings of this hatred reveals a complex interplay of factors, from personal frustrations to broader societal pressures. Understanding these motivations is crucial to comprehending the depth and persistence of this negative public perception.The perception of athletes, especially those deemed highly successful or powerful, often triggers a potent mixture of envy and resentment.

This can manifest as a projection of personal inadequacies onto the athlete, fueling the flames of public disapproval. Furthermore, the relentless pursuit of excellence and perfection in sports can create a breeding ground for frustration and criticism, particularly when outcomes fall short of expectations.

Psychological Factors

Negative emotions like envy and resentment are powerful motivators for public dislike of athletes. These feelings often stem from a perceived unfair advantage or a feeling of inadequacy. For example, an athlete’s exceptional talent or achievements can be seen as a personal failure by those who haven’t attained similar success. This perceived threat to personal worth can lead to animosity and hostility.

Furthermore, athletes’ public image, sometimes idealized or exaggerated, can become a target for projection of societal anxieties and frustrations. This creates an environment where public disapproval can be easily amplified.

Group Dynamics and Social Comparison

Group dynamics play a significant role in shaping public opinion about athletes. Fans often identify with particular teams or players, fostering a sense of belonging and shared experience. When these groups perceive an athlete as a threat to their team’s success or as embodying negative values, the negative perception can spread rapidly. Social comparison, where individuals evaluate themselves against others, often plays a crucial role.

If an athlete is perceived as embodying a standard of excellence that others cannot achieve, it can create feelings of inferiority and frustration, fueling public discontent. For instance, a player perceived as excessively demanding or lacking in sportsmanship can elicit negative reactions across various fan groups.

Perceived Failures and Negative Reactions

A critical factor in shaping public opinion is the perception of failure. Whether it’s a missed opportunity, a controversial decision, or a perceived lack of effort, perceived failures can lead to strong negative reactions. This can be amplified by the media’s focus on controversies and negative narratives, which can contribute to a distorted public perception. The public often demands high standards and perfection, and any perceived shortcoming can trigger significant negative reactions.

The media often plays a key role in amplifying these reactions.

Societal Pressures and Public Perception

Societal pressures influence public perception in various ways. Athletes often face immense pressure to perform at their peak, to maintain a perfect image, and to adhere to strict codes of conduct. Failure to meet these expectations can result in public backlash and criticism. The pressure to conform to a certain image can be immense. For instance, a player’s personal life, off-field behavior, or even perceived political stances can be scrutinized and judged harshly by the public.

Examples of athletes facing societal scrutiny for their choices or perceived failures abound in the sports world.

Potential Motivations Table, Top 10 most hated athletes of all time

Potential Motivation	Explanation	Illustrative Example
Envy/Resentment	Perceived unfair advantage or inadequacy	A highly paid athlete may be viewed with resentment by those struggling financially.
Social Comparison	Evaluating oneself against others	A player who appears to lack effort might receive negative reactions from fans comparing them to other athletes perceived as more dedicated.
Perceived Failure	Missed opportunities, controversial decisions	A key player’s missed crucial game-winning shot may be scrutinized intensely by the public.
Societal Pressure	Pressure to conform to expectations	An athlete’s personal life or political views may be judged harshly by the public.
Group Dynamics	Shared identity and experience	A player’s actions that contradict the values of a particular fan base can lead to significant negative feedback.

Impact on Sports Culture

The intense hatred directed towards certain athletes profoundly impacts the broader sports culture. It’s not simply a matter of individual animosity; this negativity can create a toxic environment that affects everything from player morale and fan engagement to the overall perception of the sport itself. This negativity can have unforeseen consequences, ultimately altering the way we experience and understand sports.The negativity surrounding certain athletes can spill over into the broader sporting community, influencing how fans and players alike behave and interact.

This can lead to a climate of fear and intimidation, impacting the spirit of fair play and sportsmanship that are crucial to the integrity of the sport.

Media Influence on Athlete Perceptions

The media plays a significant role in shaping public opinion about athletes. Sensationalized reporting, whether through biased articles or social media posts, can contribute to the creation and amplification of negative sentiment. The way athletes are portrayed, especially those perceived as controversial, can have a long-lasting impact on their reputations and careers.

Consequences of Negative Sentiment

Negative sentiment towards athletes can have several adverse consequences:

Reduced player motivation and performance: Athletes facing constant criticism and abuse can experience a decline in morale and motivation. This can manifest in decreased performance levels, affecting team dynamics and overall success. The pressure to perform under such scrutiny can also lead to mental health issues, highlighting the importance of supporting athletes’ well-being.
Increased scrutiny and pressure: Athletes often face intense scrutiny and pressure, especially when facing negative public perception. This can affect their personal lives and professional development, potentially leading to negative career outcomes.
Deterioration of fan engagement: Fans might feel alienated or discouraged by the negative environment surrounding their favorite teams or players. This can lead to a decline in attendance, merchandise sales, and overall fan engagement with the sport.

Impact on the Culture of Sports

The hatred of athletes can significantly alter the cultural fabric of sports. It can erode the values of sportsmanship, respect, and fair play, replacing them with a culture of negativity and animosity. This shift can be seen in the tone of discussions about sports, the way athletes are treated in the media, and even the types of stories that gain traction.

Aspect of Sports Culture	Impact of Athlete Hatred
Fan Behavior	Increased negativity, potentially leading to harassment and abuse
Player Performance	Decreased motivation, increased anxiety, and potentially decreased performance
Media Coverage	Sensationalized reporting, biased perspectives, and a focus on controversy
Sportsmanship	Erosion of respect, fair play, and positive values

Examples of Negative Impacts

The 2016 US Presidential Election, a highly charged political event, serves as a prime example of how intense public sentiment can impact athlete careers and public perception. Athletes perceived as supporting one candidate or the other could face a significant backlash from opposing fans and political commentators.

Conclusive Thoughts

In conclusion, the “Top 10 Most Hated Athletes of All Time” reveals a complex interplay of factors shaping public opinion. From historical context to modern media, we’ve examined the motivations behind athlete hatred and its consequences. While some athletes may face intense criticism, it’s important to distinguish between legitimate criticism and the more intense, often unwarranted, hatred that can take hold.

The study also highlights the evolving nature of public perception and the profound impact of social media in amplifying negativity.